<<
>>

References

Appleby, J. 1978. Economic Thought and Ideology in Seventeenth- Century England. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Aspromourgos, T. 1986. “Political Economy and the Social Division of Labour: The Economics of Sir William Petty,” Scottish Journal of Political Economy 33, no.

1: 28-45.

Bhaduri, A. 1983. The Economic Structure of Backward Agriculture. London and New York: Academic Press. Cantillon, R. 1755. Essai sur la nature du commerce engeneral. Reprint edited by H. Higgs, London: Frank Cass, 1959.Capelli, C., and G. Vaggi. 2016. “Why Gross National Disposable Income Should Replace Gross National Income,” Development and Change 47, no. 2: 223-39.

Chang, H.-J. 2002. Kicking Away the Ladder: Development Strategy in Historical Perspective. London: Anthem Press.

Cimoli, M., and G. Porcile. 2011. “Global Growth and International Cooperation: A Structuralist Perspective,” Cambridge Journal of Economics 35, no. 2: 383-400.

De Vivo, G. 2014. Catalogue of the Library of Piero Saffa. Torino and Milan: Fondazione Luigi Einaudi and Fondazione Raffaele Mattioli.

Fox-Genovese, E. 1976. The Origins of Physiocracy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Groenewegen, P 2017. “Turgot and the Division of Labor.” Chapter 6 in this volume.

Herlitz, L. 1988. Ideas of Capital and Development in Pre-Classical Economic Thought. Institute of Economic History Report 7. Goteborg: Institute of Economic History.

Hoselitz, B. F. 1968. ‘Agrarian Capitalism, the Natural Order of Things: Franyois Quesnay,” Kyklos 21, no. 4: 637-63.

Hutchison, T. 1988. Before Adam Smith. Oxford: Blackwell.

Kuczynski, M., and R. L. Meek, eds. 1972. Quesnay,s Tableau Economique. Edited for The Royal Economic Society. London: Macmillan.

Lewis, W A. 1954. “Economic Development with Unlimited Supplies of Labour,” Manchester School 22, no.

2: 139-91.

Meek, R. L. 1976. Social Science and the Ignoble Savage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mirabeau, V R. 1760. Theorie de l’Impot. The Hague: Benjamin Gibert. Reprint Aalen: Scientia Verlag, 1972.

-----. 1769. “Suite de la Seizieme lettre de M.B. A M*** et la Quatrieme sur la Stabilite de l'Order Legal.” In Ephemerides du citoyen, vol. 2. Paris: Didot.

Mun, T 1623(?). England’s Treasure by Forraign Trade. London: Thomas Clark, 1664. Reprint New York: Augustus M. Kelley, 1986.

Murphy, A. E. 1986. Richard Cantillon: Entrepreneur and Economist. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Myint, H. 1977. “Adam Smith's Theory of International Trade in the Perspective of Economic Development,” Economica 44, no. 175: 231-48.

Petty, W. 1662. A Treatise of Taxes and Contributions. London: Brooke. Reprinted in The Economic Writings of Sir William Petty, edited by C. H. Hull, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1899.

-----. 1676. Political Arithmetick. London: Clavel and Mortlock, 1690. Reprinted in The Economic Writings of Sir William Petty, edited by C. H. Hull, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1899.

Quesnay, E 2005. Franqois Quesnay—Ouvres economique completes et autres texte, edited by C. There, L. Charles and J-C. Perrot. 2 vols. Paris: INED—Institut Nationale d'Etudes Demographiques.

Roncaglia, A. 1975. Sraffa e la teoria deiprezzi. Roma-Bari: Laterza. (English edition: Sraffa and the Theory of Prices. Chichester: John Wiley, 1978).

--------. 1977. Petty: la nascita dell’economiapolitica. Milano: Etas Libri.

Rubin, I. I. 1979. A History of Economic Thought. London, Ink Links. (Originally published in 1929 in Russian).

Sai-Wing Ho, P 2016. “Linking the Insights of Smith, Marx, Young and Hirschman on the Division of Labour: Implications for Economic Integration and Uneven Development,” Cambridge Journal of Economics 40, no. 3: 913-39.

Smith A., 1763. ‘Early Draft’ of Part of the Wealth of Nations, in Lectures on Jurisprudence.

Reprint edited by R. L. Meek, D. D. Raphael and P. G. Stein. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978.

-----. 1762-63. Lectures on Jurisprudence. Report of 1762-63. Reprint edited by R. L. Meek, D. D. Raphael and P. G. Stein. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978.

-----. 1776. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Reprint edited by R. H. Campbell, A. S. Skinner and W. B. Todd. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976.

Sraffa, P 1960. Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Stathakis, G., and G. Vaggi. 2006. “Economic Development and Social Change: The Classical View and the Moderns.” In Economic Development and Social Change: Historical Roots and Modern Perspectives, edited by G. Stathakis and G. Vaggi, 1-25. Abingdon: Routledge.United Nations (UN). 2015. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. September 25­27. Geneva: United Nations. Available at: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/.

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). 1996. Trade and Development Report. Geneva: United Nations.

Vaggi, G. 1987. The Economics of Franqois Quesnay. London: Macmillan.

-----. 1990. “The Classical Concept of Profit Revisited.” In Perspectives on the History of Economics Thought, edited by D. E. Moggridge, vol. 3. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.

Vaggi, G., and P Groenewegen. 2003. A Concise History of Economic Thought. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Van den Berg, R., and A. Steenge. 2016. “Tableaux and Systemes: Early French Contributions to Linear Production Models,” Cahiers d’economiepolitique: Histoire de lapensee et theories 71:11-30.

Wade, R. 1990. Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Weulersse, G. 1910. Le mouvement physiocratique en France (de 1756 a 1770). 2 vols. Paris: Alcan Editeur. Reprinted Paris: Mouton, 1968.

<< | >>
Source: Corsi M., Kregel J., D’Ippoliti C. (Eds.). Classical Economics Today: Essays in Honor of Alessandro Roncaglia. Anthem Press,2018. — 275 p. 2018

More on the topic References:

  1. References
  2. References and further reading
  3. References and further reading
  4. Notes
  5. Postlude
  6. Free Trade
  7. Though Adam Smith posed the main questions with which subsequent classical writers dealt, he left a number of loose ends in his argument.
  8. Richard Cantillon
  9. Work