<<
>>

Grain output

Between 1696 and 1796, in European Russia (within the boundaries of 1696), nearly 21.4 million hectares of woods were cleared and put to agricultural use. The share of meadows and pastures rose from 20% to 31% of total agricultural land.

In European Russia sown area was extended by 2.5 times, while population increased by 2.2 times (taking into account people living in territories

annexed during the eighteenth century). Total crop area was extended even more, owing to the transition from a two- field system to a three-field system and from a system of land long disused to a system of regular fallow land. This is clearly seen from the following data: in 1763—96 in European Russia sown area was extended by 1.5 times, while in 1780—1800 total output increased by 1.6 times and according to some estimates even doubled (Rubinshtein 1957: 327—34; Tsvetkov 1957: 110—18, 133; Mironov 1979: 115—17). Since no major technical innovations were introduced into agriculture it is reasonable to assume that this required an increase in labour costs on the part of the peasantry. The increase in crop area resulted in an increase in agricultural produce. Before the 1770s, grain harvests rose also, owing to rising yield capacity. In 1696-1763 crop area was extended by 1.7 times, yield capacity rose by 1.3 times, consequently corn harvests increased by 2.2 times whereas population increased by 1.8 times (see Table 10.3).

However, the intensive cultivation of land without proper application of fertilizers and a decrease in fallow fields, as well as unusually adverse weather conditions throughout most of Europe (Borisenkov and Pasetskii 1988: 62-91, 504; Komlos 1989: 110-11), resulted in a decline in yield capacity by 39.9% in the main agricultural regions in the last three decades of the eighteenth century (see Table 10.4).4

Due to this fall in yields, capacity grain output began to lag behind the increase in crops, but remained ahead of population growth.

In 1780-1804, although population increased by 19%, total grain output increased by 28%, that is, by 8% per capita. Thus the production of grain, the main foodstuff, outstripped population growth and contributed to the increase in labour costs on the one hand and to the growth of the main foodstuff production on the other hand. However, the total number of cattle decreased (Rubinshtein 1957: 389-401); the decline in fodder supply in particular is indicative of this. In 1696-1763 meadows and pasture areas decreased by 6%, and in 1763-96 they increased only by 21%, while population increased by 63% (see Table 10.3).

Table 10.3 Size (in 1,000 ha) and distribution of land resources in eighteenth-century European Russia, crop capacity, and population (in millions)

Year Plough-land Meadows/ pastures Forest Total Crop capacity Population
1696 31,976 67,068 213,416 405,091 3.4 13.0
1725 41,848 66,296 213,958 418,219 4.0 16.2
1763 53,865 63,308 205,890 423,128 4.4 23.5
1796 81,359 76,650 217,322 485,465 3.2 38.2

‘ Output/Seed ratios for the main grains

Source: Indova 1970: 141-55, Kabuzan 1971: 52, Klochkov 1915: 150, Tsvetkov 1957: 110-14.

Table 10.4 Output/seed ratios for the major grains in central Russia in the eighteenth century, by decades

Grain 1710s 1720s 1730s 1740s 1750s 1760s 1770s 1780s 1790s
Rye 2.9 3.6 3.2 4.3 3.7 4.7 4.2 3.3 3.1
Wheat 3.9 3.7 3.9 3.6 3.3 3.8 4.3 3.2 3.0
Oats 2.7 4.1 3.3 3.8 3.5 4.5 4.8 3.4 3.6
Barley 3.9 4.5 4.0 3.7 4.3 4.7 4.2 3.5 3.1
Average 3.0 3.9 3.4 4.0 3.6 4.6 4.4 3.4 3.3

Source: Indova 1970: 141—55.

In the 1790s net output of food grains per rural capita was approximately 250 kg, excluding oats (100 kg) and excluding seeds (Rubinshtein 1957: 374—80).

This is the amount of grain consumed by the peasantry in Russia in 1896—1913 (Mironov 1995: 71). Intheeighteenthcenturytheydid not produce potatoes, the consumption of which in 1896—1913 had increased the calorie content of nutrition by 10%. On the other hand, the output of meat, dairy produce, vegetables, fish, and game was undoubtedly greater. In 1896—1913 the average stature of recruits (minimum height standard being lesser) was 166.6 cm, while in 1790—9 it was 5.9 cm less! The average height of the men born in 1896-1915 was 166.6 cm (Mironov 2000: 345).

Why was this so? In 1790-9 a peasant had to sell a considerable part of his agricultural produce in order to pay taxes, rent, and to buy other goods that he needed and did not produce himself. The analysis of tax and rent explicitly shows this (see Tables 10.5 and Tables 10.6).

4.3

<< | >>
Source: Allen R.C., Bengtsson T., Dribe M.. Living Standards in the Past: New Perspectives on Well-Being in Asia and Europe. Oxford University Press,2005. - 495 p.. 2005

More on the topic Grain output:

  1. Food
  2. NOTES
  3. List of Tables
  4. The Ancient Regime
  5. Early Arab-Islamic economic thought
  6. David Ricardo and Comparative Advantage
  7. Balogh's Contributions
  8. Index
  9. How Plausible is a Nineteenth-Century Decline in Living Stand­ards?
  10. References