<<
>>

Value and Price after Ricardo: The Bifurcation

Three intellectual responses were possible to the Ricardian difficulty in combining a labour theory of value with capitalist competition and the equalization of the rate of profit.

The first was simply to abandon the idea that there was a competitive tendency towards the equalization of the rate of profit. Typically, this was not pursued. Not only did it appear to run counter to an evident empirical tendency; at a deeper level it ran counter to the notion of a decentralized economy that was (self-)organized by competi­tive behaviour rather than merely anarchic. The second was to separate the theory of value from its dependence on labour performed, a path taken by neoclassical economics after the 1870s. The third was to recast the labour theory of value, which was attempted by Marx.

<< | >>
Source: Faccarello G., Kurz H.-D.. Handbook on the history of economic analysis. Volume III, Developments in major fields of economics. Edward Elgar,2016. — 659 p. 2016

More on the topic Value and Price after Ricardo: The Bifurcation:

  1. Value and Price after Ricardo: The Bifurcation