<<
>>

The Weights and New Products

The inclusion of rents and the price of bread is a major step forward in comparison with the first-generation CPIs. The selection of different weighting schemes is another potential area of improvement.

Phelps Brown and Hopkins, for example, assumed that the weighting scheme remained unchanged between the thirteenth and the twentieth centuries, which is a strong assumption. Theoretically, one would expect consumers to adapt to changes in relative prices in such a way as to increase the consumption of goods, which were becoming cheaper. Shammas (1990) has documented such a process for England, showing that the share of foodstuffs in the budget was already falling and the share of industrial goods was rising during the early modern period. De Vries and van der Woude (1997) have summarized comparable evidence related to the changes in consumption patterns in the Netherlands; their main sources were the accounts of institutions for which it has been possible to reconstruct their pattern of expenditure on consumption goods. Ongoing research by Arthur van Riel on expenditure patterns in the nineteenth century are another source of information (see van Zanden and van Riel 2000: 409). On the basis of these studies two sets of weights for labouring families have been constructed: one for the eighteenth century (linked to indices 1720—44=100) and one for the fifteenth century (1450—74=100). The latter weights are rather similar to the ones applied by Phelps Brown and Hopkins, whereas the eighteenth-century weights are modelled after the nineteenth-century expenditure pattern found in van Riel's work. I have also added the estimated expenditure pattern of the Dutch elite during the first half of the nineteenth century, which was reconstructed by Arthur van Riel. This elite weighting scheme was estimated on the basis of a comparison between the expenditure pattern of the labourers from budget studies and the structure of expenditure of the total population from the reconstructed national accounts (see Smits, Horlings, and van Zanden 2000); the elite was the difference between the two, taking into consideration their share in total income.
The ‘other industrial goods' which appear in the latter budgets have been allocated to the other items of non-food expenditure. (See Table 7.3.)

These four expenditure patterns were applied to the price series, which eventually were converted into indices 1450—74=100. To find out how important the use of different weighting schemes is, I calculated four CPIs on this basis (1450-74=100) (see Table 7.4). The index of wages was used as the price index of consumer services in the elite CPI, which represents the ‘consumption' of the labour of servants.

The similarities between the different series are perhaps more striking than the differences. The two indices based on the estimated expenditure patterns of labourers in Holland show a remarkable degree of similarity. This is an important result as it shows that, in spite of the fact that the labourers tried to adapt to changes

Table 7.3 Stylized expenditure patterns

bgcolor=white>Elite
Labourer
England c.

13-20th

Holland c. 15th Holland c. 18th Netherlands

1806/62

Netherlands

1800/52

Foodstuff
Bread (Rye) 20.0 40.0 30.0 22.1 16.0
Dairy product
Butter 12.5 5.0 5.0 5.9 9.0
Meat 25.0 10.0 3.0 4.4 9.0
Fish 5.0 2.0 0.8 3.0
Vegetables
Peas etc. 5.0 15.0 5.0 5.0
Potatoes 11.8
Drink 22.5 10.0 5.0 4.1 4.0
Other
Groceries 6.7 10.0-
Foodstuff, total 80.0 75.0 60.0 60.8 56.0
Textiles 12.5 9.0 15.0 15.4 10.0
Fuel (Peat) 7.5 7.0 11.0 8.9 1.0
Soap 2.0 3.0 3.5 5.0
Rent 7.0 11.0 11.4 7.0
Consumer
services 15.0
Other (Industrial) 6.0b
Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

‘ In the elite index this was estimated as sugar 5% and pepper 5%.

b Estimated by the price of paper.

Based on: nineteenth-century budgets: van Zanden and van Riel (2000: 409), other budgets: de Vries and van der Woude (1997: 708—9), Phelps Brown and Hopkins (1981).

in relative prices by adjusting their demand patterns (i.e. by consuming less expensive bread, meat, and butter, and more cheap textiles), they were unable to do much about the enormous increase in the general price level. An important reason for this was that they were ‘forced’ to spend more on housing, due to the fact that rents were going up relative to all other prices.

The absence of this rent squeeze, which has been ignored in much of the literature on the price revolution of the early modern period, largely explains the difference between the England price index (i.e. the price index using the PBH weights) and the Holland indices, although the substitution of bread prices for rye also played a role. The elite CPI also shows a much less rapid increase, which is mainly due to three developments: (1) bread had a much smaller weight in the basket of the elite; (2) the elite profited from the relative decline of the price of consumer services (wages); and (3) they also profited from the decline of the prices of industrial and colonial products, which they consumed in much larger quantities than the

Table 7.4 CPIs using four different weighting schemes, and the final index, 1450/74—100

England Holland fifteenth century Netherlands eighteenth cen­tury Elite Final index
1450-74 100 100 100 100 100
1475-99 133 140 142 123 140
1500-24 141 146 150 133 146
1525-49 170 182 183 158 182
1550-74 275 299 296 254 299
1575-99 476 494 480 433 494
1600-24 575 658 668 567 658
1625-49 767 873 863 716 873
1650-74 794 958 982 778 973
1675-99 791 955 960 754 955
1700-24 841 980 957 764 945
1725-49 805 950 936 752 923
1750-74 866 1,011 1,018 796 1,006
1775-99 1,004 1,177 1,168 910 1,113

Sources. Tables 7.2, 7.3, and Appendix.

labourers. This experiment suggests that in the early modern period, relative prices moved in general in a direction which was unfavourable for the lower classes (i.e. sharp increases in the prices of bread, beer, and of rents) and favourable for the elite (i.e. a relative decline of wages—and therefore of household services—and of industrial prices).

Changes in the patterns of consumption of the labourers did not affect their CPI very much, however. The strong decline in meat consumption and the increased demand for industrial products that can be observed in early modern Europe were rather weak attempts to stem the tide of the almost continuous rise of prices (only after 1675 did inflation come to a halt). Similar results were obtained by Phelps Brown and Hopkins (1981: 89), who in one of their papers also referred to an experiment with different weights for their CPI, but which did not have a big impact on its long­term development. This is a striking result, because one would expect a rather different outcome, that is, that changes in relative prices and demand patterns combined would have moderated the price increases to some extent. Labourers were, however, ‘trapped’ because they really needed basic foodstuffs and shelter and could not switch out of them to an extent which would seriously have changed their ‘terms of trade’ (i.e. the relationship between nominal wages and the CPI).

There may have been one exception to this. In the literature on changes in patterns of food consumption in this period much attention has been paid to the rise of the potato, a crop which replaced bread and vegetables (peas and beans) on the tables of labourers in the second half of the eighteenth century. This occurred in a period of renewed inflation when Dutch nominal wages remained more or less the same (and

therefore real wages seem to have declined substantially). Noordegraaf and others have suggested that labourers may have stabilized their real incomes by switching to potatoes, which provided many more calories per guilder.

There are different ways to change the CPI in order to take this process into account. The standard procedure is to create new indices on the basis of the new expenditure patterns which come into existence, in this case, as a result of the introduction of the potato; on the basis of the qualitative literature on this topic and the nineteenth-century budgets it can be estimated that the share of potatoes in the budget increased from 3% in the 1770s to 6% in the 1780s and 9% in the 1790s.

A ‘quasi-hedonic’ price index can also be estimated: assuming that the aim of consumption (of bread and potatoes) is the intake of calories, one can calculate the relative prices of the calories contained in these products, and introduce the price of potatoes accordingly. The welfare effect of getting more calories per guilder from potatoes is then taken into account (the weights are again identical to the ones used in the first approach; 3% for the 1770s etc.). Figure 7.1 gives an indication of the kilocalories that one guilder represented, which clearly shows the big difference in price per calorie between potatoes on the one hand and bread and peas on the other hand.

Both adaptations of the CPI show a more moderate rate of inflation after 1763 when the series of potato prices begins. If we accordingly recalculate the CPI based on the eighteenth-century weights, and set 1763=100 for convenience, the index for 1790—9 is 122.9 for the unchanged CPI, 119.5 for the CPI with a conventional introduction of the potato, and 115.9 for the recalculated CPI with a ‘hedonic’ introduction of the new crop. It appears that the potato did make a difference, but it only lowered the rate of inflation after 1763 by about a third.

Figure 7.1 The price of 1,000 kcal in guilders (1783—1800)

Figure 7.2 The CPI for the western part of the Netherlands, 1450—1800 (1450/74—100; polynomial trend added)

The final CPI was calculated on the basis of the fifteenth-century weights for the period 1450—1656 (1450-74—100) and on the basis of the eighteenth-century weights for the period 1656-1800 (1720-44—100).10 The final index (recalculated 1450/74—100) is shown in Figure 7.2.

It shows a pattern which is to some extent well known: a huge increase in the price level during the sixteenth century and the first half of the seventeenth century, followed by much more stable development between about 1650 and 1750, and a second strong increase after about 1750 (though compared with the sixteenth-century price revolution this increase was rather moderate). Comparable first-generation calculations by de Vries and van der Woude showed a decline after about 1660, which is not present in this series. The difference is largely due to bread prices—instead of rye prices—and the role of rents.

5.

<< | >>
Source: Allen R.C., Bengtsson T., Dribe M.. Living Standards in the Past: New Perspectives on Well-Being in Asia and Europe. Oxford University Press,2005. - 495 p.. 2005

More on the topic The Weights and New Products: