References and further reading
Baudeau, N. and J.-J.-L. Graslin (1777), Correspondance entre M. Graslin, de l’Academie economique de S. Petersbourg, Auteur de l’Essai analytique sur la Richesse & sur l’Impot et M.
l’abbe Baudeau, Auteur des Ephemerides du citoyen sur un des Principes fondamentaux de la Doctrine des soi-disants Philosophes Economistes, London and Paris: Onfroy.Cartelier, J. (1991), ‘L’economie politique de Francois Quesnay ou l’Utopie du Royaume agricole’, in J. Cartelier (ed.), Physiocratie, Droit Naturel, Tableau economique et autres textes, Paris: GF-Flammarion, pp. 9-64.
Cartelier, J. and G. Longhitano (eds) (2012), Quesnay and Physiocracy: Studies and Materials, Paris: L’Harmattan.
Charles, L. (1999), ‘La liberte du commerce des grains et l’economie politique francaise’, PhD dissertation, University Paris 1 Pantheon-Sorbonne.
Charles, L. (2000), ‘From the Encyclopedie to the Tableau economique: Quesnay on freedom of grain trade and economic growth’, European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 7 (1), 1-21.
Charles, L. (2003), ‘The visual history of the Tableau Economique’, European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 10 (4), 527-50.
Charles, L. and P. Steiner (1999), ‘Entre Montesquieu et Rousseau. La physiocratie parmi les origines intel- lectuelles de la Revolution’, Etudes Jean-Jacques Rousseau, 11, 83-160.
Charles, L. and C. There (2007), ‘Francois Quesnay: a “rural Socrates” in Versailles?’, History of Political Economy, 39 (1), annual supplement, 195-214.
Charles, L. and C. There (2008), ‘The writing workshop of Francois Quesnay and the making of physiocracy (1757-1764)’, History of Political Economy, 40 (1), 1-42.
Charles, L. and A. Orain (2016), ‘Francois Veron de Forbonnais and the invention of antiphysiocracy’, in S.L. Kaplan and S. Reinert (eds), The Economic Turn: Recasting Political Economy in Eighteenth-Century Europe, London, New York and Delhi: Anthem Press, forthcoming.
Delmas, B., T. Demals and P. Steiner (eds) (1995), La diffusion international de la Physiocratie: 18 19 siecle, Grenoble: Presses universitaires de Grenoble.
Eltis, W. (1975a), ‘Francois Quesnay: a reinterpretation. 1. The Tableau economique’, Oxford Economic Papers, 27 (2), 167-200.
Eltis, W. (1975b), ‘Francois Quesnay: a reinterpretation. 2. The theory of economic growth’, Oxford Economic Papers, 27 (3), 327-51.
Eltis, W. (1996), ‘The Grand Tableau of Francois Quesnay’s economics’, European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 3 (1), 21-43.
Faccarello, G. (1998), ‘Galiani, Necker and Turgot. A debate on economic reform and policy in 18th century France’, in G. Faccarello (ed.), Studies in the History of French Political Economy, From Bodin to Walras, London: Routledge, pp. 120-85.
Faccarello, G. and P. Steiner (eds) (1990), La pensee economique pendant la Revolution franςaise, Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.
Faccarello, G. and P. Steiner (2008), ‘Interest, sensationism and the science of the legislator: French “philosophie economique”’, European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 15 (1), 1-23.
Graslin, J.-J.-L. (1767), Essai analytique sur la richesse et sur l’impot, London.
Ferrand, J. and A. Orain (2016), ‘Sensualism, modern natural law and “science of commerce” at the heart of the controversy between Mably and the physiocrats’, in S.L. Kaplan and S. Reinert (eds), The Economic Turn: Recasting Political Economy in Eighteenth-Century Europe, London, New York and Delhi: Anthem Press, forthcoming.
Forbonnais, F.V. de (1767), Principes et observations economiques, Amsterdam: Marc Michel Rey.
Galiani, F. (1770), Dialogues sur le commerce des bles, London.
Gehrke, C. and H.D. Kurz (1995), ‘Marx on physiocracy’, European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 2 (1), 53-90.
Gilibert, G. (1977), La costruzione della “macchina della prosperity", Milan: Etas Libri.
Herlitz, L.
(1996), ‘From spending and reproduction to circuit flow and equilibrium: the two conceptions of Tableau economique’, European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 3 (1), 1-20.Kaplan, S.L. (2016a), Bread, Politics and Political Economy in the Reign of Louis XV, 2nd edn, London, New York and Delhi: Anthem Press; first published 1976.
Kaplan, S.L. (2016b), ‘Galiani: grain and governance’, in S.L. Kaplan and S. Reinert (eds), The Economic Turn: Recasting Political Economy in Eighteenth-Century Europe, London, New York and Delhi: Anthem Press.
Lemercier de la Riviere, P.-P. (1767), L’ordre naturel et essentiel des societes politiques, London: Nourse, and Paris: Desaint.
Linguet, S.-N.-H. (1771), Reponse aux docteurs modernes, ou apologiepour l’auteur de “La Theorie des loix" et des Lettres sur cette theorie. Avec la refutation du systemes desphilosophes economistes, n.p.
Mably, G.B. de (1768), Doutes proposes aux philosophes economistes sur l,ordre naturel et essentiel des societes politiques, in G.B. de Mably (1794-95), Collection complete des auvres de l’abbe de Mably, vol. 11, Paris: Desbriere, pp. 1-256.
Magnot, F. (2015), ‘A body without a voice: a literary approach to Linguet’s opposition to the physiocrats over the free trade in grain’, European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 22 (3), 420-44.
Meek, R.L. (1962), The Economics of Physiocracy, London: George Allen and Unwin.
Mergey, A. (2010), L’Etat des Physiocrates: autorite et decentralisation, Aix-en-Provence: Presses Universitaires d’Aix-Marseille.
Mirabeau, V.R. de and F. Quesnay (1763), Philosophie rurale ou Economie generale etpolitique de l’Agriculture, Amsterdam: Les libraires associes.
Mirabeau, V.R. de and F. Quesnay (1999), Traite de la monarchie, Paris: L’Harmattan, written in 1757-60. Necker, J. (1775), Sur la legislation et le commerce des grains, Paris: Pissot.
Orain, A. (2006), ‘Directing or reforming behaviours? A discussion of Condillac’s theory of vraiprix,, History of Political Economy, 38 (3), 497-530.
Orain, A. (2012), ‘Graslin and Forbonnais against the Tableau economique’, in J. Cartelier and G. Longhitano (eds), Quesnay and Physiocracy: Studies and Materials, Paris: L’Harmattan, pp. 87-111.
Orain, A. (2015), ‘Figures of mockery. A cultural disqualification of Physiocracy (1760-1790)’, European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 22 (3), 383-419.
Orain, A. (2016), ‘“One must make war on the lunatics”. The physiocrats’ attacks on Linguet, the iconoclast (1767-1775)’, in S.L. Kaplan and S. Reinert (eds), The Economic Turn: Recasting Political Economy in Eighteenth-Century Europe, London, New York and Delhi: Anthem Press, forthcoming.
Quesnay, F. (2005), (Euvres, economiques completes et autres textes, ed. C. There, L. Charles and J.-C. Perrot, 2 vols, Paris: INED.
Steiner, P. (1994), ‘Demand, price and net product in Quesnay’s early writings’, European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 1 (2), 231-51.
Steiner, P. (1997), ‘Quesnay et le commerce’, Revue d’economiepolitique, 107 (5), 695-713.
Steiner, P. (1998), La “science nouvelle” de l’economiepolitique, Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
Vaggi, G. (1987), The Economics of Franfois Quesnay, London: Macmillan.
Weulersse, G. (1910), Le mouvementphysiocratique en France (de 1756 a 1770), Paris: Alcan.
Weulersse, G. (1950), La Physiocratie sous les ministeres de Turgot et de Necker, 1774-1781, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Weulersse, G. (1985), La Physiocratie a Taube de la Revolution, 1781-1792, Paris: Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales.