The New Classical All-Out Attack on Keynesian Macroeconomics
Friedman had few qualms about the Marshallian-Keynesian conceptual apparatus. His anti-Keynesian offensive was mainly a matter of policy. This was no longer true for the next wave of attack against Keynesian theory led by Lucas and others, and inaugurating “new classical macroeconomics”.
While the new approach was evidently collective, Lucas was the leading character in the movement, and commandingly assumed the role of its methodological spokesperson.The transition from Keynesian to new classical macroeconomics deserves to be viewed as a Kuhnian scientific revolution. This expression refers to an episode in the history of a discipline where a period of normal development is disturbed because of the persistence of unsolved puzzles which trigger a drive to change the agenda, the conceptual toolbox and the research methods in radical ways. This is often accompanied by thundering declarations of war (for example, Keynesian theory is “dead”), a confrontation between younger and older generations of researchers, the rise of new stars in the profession, and the eclipse of the previous stars.
More on the topic The New Classical All-Out Attack on Keynesian Macroeconomics:
- The New Keynesian Counter-Offensive
- Three important “essays in persuasion” on the proper economic role of the state: 1925-1926
- Faccarello G., Kurz H.-D.. Handbook on the history of economic analysis. Volume III, Developments in major fields of economics. Edward Elgar,2016. — 659 p, 2016
- THE ATTACK ON SAY'S LAW AND THE INTERPRETATION OF MONEY
- Postscript to Keynesian Economics
- Methodology and ideology
- THE RE-INTERPRETATION OF THE RATE OF INTEREST
- 3. THE CONDITIONS FOR AUTOCENTRIC ACCUMULATION: THE ROLE OF THE MONETARY SYSTEM
- Postscript to Neo-Classical Economics
- The economic cycle