<<
>>

References and further reading

Ayres, C.E. (1938), The Problem of Economic Order, New York: Farrar and Rinehart.

Ayres, C.E. (1944), The Theory of Economic Progress, Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina.

Barber, W.J. (1996), Designs within Disorder: Franklin D. Roosevelt, the Economists, and the Shaping of Economic Policy, 1933-1945, New York: Cambridge University Press.

Bateman, B.W. (1998), ‘Clearing the ground: the demise of the social gospel movement and the rise of neo­classicism in American economics’, in M.S. Morgan and M. Rutherford (eds), From Interwar Pluralism to Postwar Neoclassicism, Annual Supplement to Volume 30 of History of Political Economy, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Berle, A.A. and G.C. Means (1932), The Modern Corporation and Private Property, New York: Macmillan. Blaug, M. (1978), Economic Theory in Retrospect, 3rd edn, London: Cambridge University Press.

Bonbright, J.C. (1961), Principles of Public Utility Rates, New York: Columbia University Press. Bonbright, J.C. and G.C. Means (1932), The Holding Company, New York: McGraw Hill.

Bromley, D.W. (1989), Economic Interests and Institutions: The Conceptual Foundations of Public Policy, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Caldwell, B.J. (1982), Beyond Positivism: Economic Methodology in the Twentieth Century, London: George Allen and Unwin.

Clark, J.M. (1917), ‘Business acceleration and the law of demand: a technical factor in business cycles’, Journal of Political Economy, 25 (March), 217-35.

Clark, J.M. (1918), ‘Economics and modern psychology’, parts I and II, Journal of Political Economy, 26 (January-February), 1-30, 136-66.

Clark, J.M. (1923), Studies in the Economics of Overhead Costs, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Clark, J.M. (1926), Social Control of Business, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Clark, J.M. (1927), ‘Recent developments in economics’, in E.C.

Hayes (ed.), Recent Developments in the Social Sciences, Philadelphia, PA: Lippencott.

Commons, J.R. (1924), The Legal Foundations of Capitalism, New York: Macmillan.

Commons, J.R. (1932), ‘The problem of correlating law, economics and ethics’, Wisconsin Law Review, 8 (December), 3-26.

Commons, J.R. (1934), Institutional Economics: Its Place in Political Economy, New York: Macmillan. Copeland, M.A. (1951), ‘Institutional economics and model analysis’, American Economic Review, 41 (May), 56-65.

Edie, L.D. (1927), ‘Some positive contributions of the institutional concept’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 41 (May), 405-40.

Ely, R.T., T.S. Adams, M.O. Lorenz, and A.A. Young (1908), Outlines of Economics, revised edn, New York: Macmillan.

Everett, H. (1931), ‘Social control’, Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, vol. 4, New York: Macmillan, pp. 344-9.

Fisher, I. (1919), ‘Economists and the public service’, American Economic Review, 9 (March), 5-21.

Fried, B.H. (1998), The Progressive Assault on Laissez Faire: Robert Hale and the First Law and Economics Movement, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Galbraith, J.K. (1958), The Affluent Society, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

Galbraith, J.K. (1967), The New Industrial State, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

Grimmer-Solem, E. (2003), The Rise of Historical Economics and Social Reform in Germany 1864-1894, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gruchy, A.G. (1974), ‘Government intervention and the social control of business: the neoinstitutionalist posi­tion’, Journal of Economic Issues, 8 (June), 235-49.

Gruchy, A.G. (1987), The Reconstruction of Economics, Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

Hale, R.L. (1921), ‘The “physical value” fallacy in rate cases’, Yale Law Journal, 30 (May), 710-31.

Hale, R.L. (1923), ‘Coercion and distribution in a supposedly non-coercive state’, Political Science Quarterly, 38 (September), 470-94.

Hamilton, W.H. (1919), ‘The institutional approach to economic theory’, American Economic Review, 9 (March), 309-18.

Hamilton, W.H. (1958), ‘Veblen - then and now’, in D. Dowd (ed.), Thorstein Veblen: A Critical Reappraisal, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Hamilton, W.H. and Associates (1938), Price and Price Policies, New York: McGraw Hill.

Hamilton, W.H. and S. May (1923), The Control of Wages, reprinted 1968, New York: Augustus M. Kelley.

Hamilton, W. H. and H.R. Wright (1925), The Case of Bituminous Coal, New York: Macmillan.

Hodgson, G.M. (1988), Institutions and Economics: A Manifesto for a Modern Institutional Economics, Cambridge: Polity Press.

Hodgson, G.M. (2004), The Evolution of Institutional Economics: Agency, Structure and Darwinism in American Institutionalism, London: Routledge.

Koopmans, T.C. (1947), ‘Measurement without theory’, Review of Economic Statistics, 29 (August), 161-72. Kyrk, H. (1923), A Theory of Consumption, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

Kyrk, H. (1933), Economic Problems of the Family, New York: Harper.

Lewin, S. (1996), ‘Economics and psychology: lessons for our own day from the early twentieth century’, Journal of Economic Literature, 35 (September), 1293-323.

McMahon, T. (1925), Social and Economic Standards of Living, Boston, MA: D.C. Heath.

Means, G.C. (1935), Industrial Prices and their Relative Inflexibility, Senate Document 13, 74th Congress, 1st Session, Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.

Mitchell, W.C. (1910a), ‘The rationality of economic activity’, pt I, Journal of Political Economy, 18 (February), 97-113.

Mitchell, W.C. (1910b), ‘The rationality of economic activity’, pt II, Journal of Political Economy, 18 (March), 197-216.

Mitchell, W.C. (1913), Business Cycles, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Mitchell, W.C. (1919), ‘Statistics and government’, reprinted in W.C. Mitchell (1950), The Backward Art of Spending Money. New York: Augustus M. Kelley, pp. 42-57.

Mitchell, W.C. (1923), ‘Making goods and making money’, reprinted in W.C. Mitchell (1950), The Backward Art of Spending Money, New York: Augustus M.

Kelly, pp. 137-48.

Mitchell, W.C. (1924), ‘The prospects of economics’, in R.G. Tugwell (ed.) (1971), The Trend of Economics, Port Washington, NY: Kennikat Press.

Mitchell, W.C. (1925), ‘Quantitative analysis in economic theory’, American Economic Review, 15 (March), 1-12.

Mitchell, W.C. (1927), Business Cycles: The Problem and its Setting, New York: NBER.

Mitchell, W.C. (1928), ‘Letter from Wesley C. Mitchell to John M. Clark’, in J.M. Clark (1936), Preface to Social Economics, New York: Farrar and Rinehart, pp. 410-16.

Mitchell, W.C. (1929), ‘Thorstein Veblen, 1857-1929’, New Republic, 60 (4 September), 66-8.

Morgan, M.S. and M. Rutherford (1998), From Interwar Pluralism to Postwar Neoclassicism, annual supplement to vol. 30 of History of Political Economy, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Perlman, S. (1928), A Theory of the Labor Movement, New York: Macmillan.

Phillips, R.J. (ed.) (1995), Economic Mavericks: The Texas Institutionalists, Greenwich, CN: JAI Press.

Ross, D. (1991), The Origins of American Social Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rutherford, M. (1998), ‘Thorstein Veblen’s evolutionary programme: a promise unfulfilled’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 22 (July), 463-77.

Rutherford, M. (1999), ‘Institutionalism as “scientific” economics’, in R. Backhouse and J. Creedy (eds), From Classical Economics to the Theory of the Firm: Essays in Honour of D.P. O’Brien, Aldershot, UK and Brookfield, VT, USA: Edward Elgar.

Rutherford, M. (2000a), ‘Understanding institutional economics: 1918-1929’, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 22 (June), 277-308.

Rutherford, M. (2000b), ‘Institutionalism between the wars’, Journal of Economic Issues, 34 (September), 291-303.

Rutherford, M. (2002), ‘Morris A. Copeland: a case study in the history of institutional economics’, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 24 (September), 261-90.

Rutherford, M. (2003), ‘Walton Hamilton, Amherst, and the Brookings graduate school: institutional economics and education’, History of Political Economy, 35 (Winter), 611-53.

Rutherford, M. (2004), ‘Institutional economics at Columbia University’, History of Political Economy, 36 (Spring), 31-78.

Rutherford, M. (2005a), ‘Who’s afraid of Arthur Burns? The NBER and the foundations’, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 27 (June), 109-39.

Rutherford, M. (2005b), ‘Walton H. Hamilton and the public control of business’, in S. Medema and P. Boettke (eds), The Role of Government in the History of Political Economy, supplement to vol. 37 of History of Political Economy, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Rutherford, M. (2006), ‘Wisconsin institutionalism: John R. Commons and his students’, Labor History, 47 (May), 161-88.

Rutherford, M. (2010), ‘Chicago economics and institutionalism’, in R. Emmett (ed.), Elgar Companion to the Chicago School of Economics, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar, pp. 25-39.

Rutherford, M. (2011), The Institutionalist Movement in American Economics, 1918-1947: Science and Social Control, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rutherford, M. and T. DesRoches (2008), ‘The institutionalist reaction to Keynesian economics’, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 30 (March), 29-48.

Samuels, W.J. (1971), ‘The interrelations between legal and economic processes’, Journal of Law and Economics, 14 (October), 435-50.

Schmid, A.A. (1978), Property, Power, and Public Choice, New York: Praeger.

Schmid, A.A. (2004), ‘The Spartan School of political economy at Michigan State University’, Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, 22-C, 207-43.

Slichter, S.H. (1924), ‘The organization and control of economic activity’, in R.G. Tugwell (ed.) (1971), The Trend of Economics, Port Washington, NY: Kennikat Press.

Slichter, S.H. (1931), Modern Economic Society, New York: H. Holt.

Stewart, W.W. (1919), ‘Economic theory: discussion’, American Economic Review, 9 (March), 319-20.

Tugwell, R.G. (1921), The economic basis for business regulation, American Economic Review, 11 (March), 643-58.

Tugwell, R.G. (1922), The Economic Basis of Public Interest, reprinted 1938, New York: Augustus M. Kelley.

Tugwell, R.G. (ed.) (1924), The Trend of Economics, reprinted 1971, Port Washington, NY: Kennikat Press.

Veblen, T. (1898), ‘Why is economics not an evolutionary science?’, reprinted 1961 in The Place of Science in Modern Civilisation, New York: Russell and Russell.

Veblen, T. (1899), The Theory of the Leisure Class, reprinted 1924, London: George Allen and Unwin.

Veblen, T. (1904), The Theory of Business Enterprise, reprinted 1975, Clifton, NJ: Augustus M. Kelley.

Veblen, T. (1906), ‘The place of science in modern civilization’, American Journal of Sociology, 11 (March), 585-609.

Veblen, T. (1921), The Engineers and the Price System, New York: B.W. Huebsch.

Yonay, Y.P. (1998), The Struggle over the Soul of Economics: Institutionalist and Neoclassical Economists in America between the Wars, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

<< | >>
Source: Faccarello G., Kurz H.D.(eds.). Handbook on the History of Economic Analysis. Volume II: Schools of Thought in Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar,2016. — 498 p. 2016

More on the topic References and further reading: