NOTES TO CHAPTER 15
1 Lydia Sargent, ed., Women and Revolution (Boston: South End Press, 1981); Alex Nove, The Economics of Feasible Socialism (Boston: Allen and Unwin, 1983).
2 Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, ‘‘Manifesto of the Communist Party,” in Robert Tucker, ed., The Marx-Engels Reader (New York: W.
W. Norton and Company Inc., 1972), P. 352.3 Marx and Engels, ‘‘The German Ideology,” in Tucker, Marx-Engels Reader, p. 124.
4 John Roemer, Free to Lose. An Introduction to Marxist Economic Philosophy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988).
5 Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, ‘‘The Communist Manifesto,” in Robert Tucker, ed., The Marx-Engels Reader (New York: W. W. Norton, 1972), p.337.
6 E. J. Hobsbawm, The Age of Revolution, 1789—1848 (New York: The World Publishing Company, 1962) p. 259.
7 See Alec Nove, The Economics of Feasible Socialism (Boston: Allen and Unwin, 1983).
8 Joan Landes, ‘‘Hegel’s Conception of the Family,” pp. 125—44 in Jean Bethke Elshtain, ed., The Family in Political Thought (Amherst: The University of Massachusetts Press, 1982), PP. 131, 137.
9 For more on this point, see Frank E. Manuel and Fritzie P. Manuel, Utopian Thought in the Western World (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1979), 708—109.
10 Karl Marx, Capital, Vol. 1. Trans. Ben Fowkes (New York: Vintage Books, 1977), p. 171. Joint labor power, in this context, is directly analogous to the neoclassical economic concept of joint utility.
11 Frederick Engels, The Condition of the Working Class in England. Translated and edited by W. O. Henderson and W. H. Chaloner (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1958), p. 162.
12 Ibid., p. 164.
13 David McLellan, Karl Marx. His Life and Thought (New York: Harper and Row, 1973), p.
177.14 Lise Vogel (Marxism and the Oppression of Women, 1983) is entirely unconvincing when she claims that, ‘‘his sources were poor.’’ (p. 59).
15 Mary Jo Buhle, Women and American Socialism, 1870—1920 (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1981), p. 11.
16 Harold Benenson, ‘‘Victorian Sexual Ideology and Marx’s Theory of the Working Class,’’ International Labor and Working Class History 25 (1984), 1—23.
17 The greatly expanded ninth edition of 1891, which incorporated some of Frederick Engels’s arguments in its historical section, became the best-known and most widely cited version. Lise Vogel, Marxism and the Oppression of Women (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1983), 97—98.
18 For an articulate modern version of this argument, see Vogel, Marxism.
19 August Bebel, Woman Under Socialism. Translated from the original German of the thirty-third edition by Daniel De Leon (New York: Schocken Books, 1971), p. 9.
20 Ibid., p. 216.
21 Ibid., p. 109.
22 Ibid., p. 370.
23 lbid., p. 347.
24 lbid., pp. 338-41.
25 Ibid., p. 187.
26 Frances Darwin, The Life and Letters of Charles Darwin (New York: D. Appleton and Co., 1888), Vol. I, p. 68.
27 Herbert Spencer, The Principles of Ethics (New York: D. Appleton, 1910), p. 187.
28 Charles Darwin, The Descent of Man (New York: Encyclopedia Britannica, Inc., 1952), p. 321.
29 Herbert Spencer, The Principles of Ethics (New York: D. Appleton, 1910), p. 216.
30 Marx and Engels, Communist Manifesto, p. 353.